Burning Ideas

Marketing strategy must reflect a coordinated effort of product performance and two-way communication. Within the communication process must be integration of marketing efforts and messages. Further, what is communicated about the product must be accurate, or the position won’t be supported. How can a company make certain that such integration occurs?
Several factors can encourage the appropriate level of integration within the marketing program. Clear strategic decisions, personnel stability, compensation systems that support the marketing strategy, and formal communication and organizational structures that encourage cross-functional interaction are among the more important.

Clear Strategic Decisions
In one study that examined mismatches between marketing and sales strategies, an issue that surfaced was a lack of decisiveness on the part of senior marketing executives. For example, two sales managers said that, although formal strategy indicated that a product would be on the market for the next few years, informal signals from marketing management indicated that the product might be withdrawn. As a result, the sales force was not putting any effort into those products. Sales and marketing strategies are neither immediate nor irreversible; if management waffles on strategic decisions, then marketing and sales investments could be wasted and relationships (both internal and external) damaged.

Personnel Stability
Relationships take time to build. As mentioned earlier, internal relationships go through the same stages as external relationships. Moving people rapidly through the organization can mean that relationships between areas of the marketing department are never built. One manager in one study reported three marketing executives in five years; one salesperson told us he had three different sales managers in one year! While each successive manager had to try to quickly build rapport with each subordinate and superior, the whole sales team suffered because new relationships had to be built between each new manager and all of the other functional areas. When rapid personnel turnover occurs, the relationship cannot get past the exploration stage.

Compensation
A key issue that creates ill will is the fact that different groups within marketing compete for the same budget. Fights over budgets can create bad feelings and damage relationships. Budgets, though, are not the only “money” issue that can damage or enhance relationships. Many companies are evaluating and testing compensation plans that encourage teamwork. For example, marketing managers may find that their pay contains incentives based on sales or contribution margins. When that is the case, they are incented to work more closely with the sales force. Morehead Supply is one company that pays quarterly bonuses to all marketing personnel if sales targets are achieved. Unlike profit sharing plans that the company also uses, these bonuses are specifically designed to encourage teamwork within the marketing–sales interface. Compensation can also help turn budgeting into teamwork. By using a joint compensation system, all of those competing for budget end up being paid based on the same performance. As a result, they are more determined than ever to see that the budget results in effective marketing. The issue, though, also affects how areas such as manufacturing, engineering, and other functional area bonuses are paid. When those areas are also compensated for customer satisfaction and teamwork, then those outcomes are more likely.

Organizational Structure
Compensation plans, though, should be supported by the appropriate organizational structure. The structure of the organization can enhance or inhibit the ability to create internal partnerships. In the next section, we discuss different types of organizational structures, as well as the different groups within marketing between whom partnerships are created.

Profits are the economic rewards to a business for providing value to customers better than the rest and running an efficient operation. If we briefly examine a few sources of profit, we can get a good preview to the upcoming discussion of the anatomy of competition. Competition is more than industrial rivals cutting prices in an effort to gain market share. It has a structure that can be described and analyzed.

Five Forces

The preceding scenarios suggest that firms have improved profit capabilities to the extent that they can withstand price pressures in the business environment. If we pause to reconsider each scenario, we see that price pressures come from five distinct sectors.

Rivalry in the Industry Not all businesses face the same amount of price pressure from their competitors in the same business. In Atlanta during the 1996 Olympics, hotels enjoyed great pricing latitude because demand outpaced the supply of local rooms. Like the lodging business, other industries are partitioned by natural boundaries or customer purchasing constraints.
If industry rivals offer relatively undifferentiated products or if demand is significantly less than overall capacity, firms will tend to find intense rivalry. Price competition frequently intensifies in declining markets because firms try to grab market share to cover fixed expenses that can’t be shrunk as rapidly as the market.

Powerful Suppliers A manufacturer that relies heavily on a unique input for its product becomes vulnerable to price hikes or other means of “holdup” from the supplier. Of course, the unique input may provide a means of differentiation for the manufacturer. The “Intel inside” sticker on a desktop computer provides many buyers assurance of a top-quality Pentium processor, no matter what the brand name on the PC. The buying firm must carefully weigh the benefits from depending on a powerful source of supply. A key question may be what the future supply situation looks like. Perhaps there will be alternative suppliers when patent protection expires or when another source—maybe even one internal to the firm— has been brought up to speed.

Threat of Substitutes Industries are typically defined by their channel position and their output. Are they manufacturers or distributors? Do they sell chemicals or rolled wire? Notice that user considerations get no mention. But clearly, if a buyer regards the products from two different industries as substitutes, the makers of those products must be considered competitors.

Threat of Potential Entrants Rapidly growing or profitable markets tend to attract new sellers. And newcomers can
change the competitive landscape in several ways. First, new participants in the market increase the productive capacity serving the market; therefore the existing demand from customers has to cover more fixed costs. Second, a new rival will fight to increase market share, perhaps displacing incumbents in the assortments of resellers or underbidding the established firms. Third, new rivals can bring new or substantial resources to the fray.

One’s objective in this process is to define good market segments. Good markets are identifiable, accessible, and substantial. These criteria work well to discipline the tasks of gauging opportunities and directing marketing effort. Identifiable members of market segments can be enumerated and evaluated. Imagine a cardiologist who developed a healthy heart program for overworked and overweight executives. Is there a practical way to identify such individuals? The cardiologist might advertise her service and/or invite prospects to a power breakfast seminar or a free risk screening. Prospects might not be so willing to identify themselves, however, if the service were for coping with chemical addictions.

Accessibility means that members of a market can be reached or impacted by some directed marketing activity. American Express knew that to get companies to adopt its corporate card, an American Express sales rep had to get some time with the prospect firm’s chief financial officer. Years of advertising, direct mail, and attempted sales calls still left 400 attractive but inaccessible accounts.
The ability to approach or address known prospective customers is necessary but not sufficient to make an opportunity. That market must be substantial, promising sufficient business to justify the efforts to serve it. Customer lifetime value is a useful criterion in an assessment of a target market. Unfortunately, a firm’s history with its current customers may provide very little basis for estimating the LTV of customers from entirely new markets.

Substantial markets can be revealed by a number of estimation techniques. One very powerful approach is the use of scenarios. Scenarios comprise a forecasting technique that requires managers to write explicit anticipated futures and articulate the chains of events that would need to occur to make the future happen. For example, Royal Dutch Shell tuned its supply strategy when its scenario process in 1973 found no compelling reasons for Arab states to increase their crude oil production. Furthermore, some of the authors helped an environmental management company determine the market for certain types of training. The task involved getting accurate counts of employees in different industries who handled hazardous and toxic materials, plus an assessment of the likelihood of new government regulations that—by fiat or new economic sanctions— would impact the training demand.
A related approach involves hard thinking and analysis of how the product fits into the value-added process. This approach is sometimes called the buildup approach or factoring. Market estimates by this approach come from building up the materials or parts units needed in a specific application or from specific accounts. For example, potential demand for a surgical staple designed for closing Caesarian sections can be estimated from a count of the average number of staples needed to close a typical Csection, times the number of C-sections performed in different countries. Projections in each country are apt to show different trends, based on differences in hospital protocols, fertility patterns, and population distributions.
The same basic approach can be applied using survey responses from prospects or from members of the sales force. Likewise, the volume of certain materials, logistical services, or MRO (maintenance, repair and operating) goods can be compared to finished products output in a statistical series. A statistical series is an estimation technique that uses the correlation between demand and some other set of economic activities to yield a forecast.

Business marketing is an exciting area of study. Students may be more familiar with consumer marketing; after all, everyone is a consumer. Business marketing, however, is new to most students. It is not the same as consumer marketing, and there are several compelling reasons for studying business marketing.

Marketing Majors Begin in Business Marketing
Are you a marketing major? As you can see, more marketing majors find jobs with businesses that sell products or services to other businesses rather than with businesses that sell to consumers. For that reason alone, it seems worthwhile to study business marketing.
Indeed, the majority of business school graduates—whether in accounting, finance, logistics, management, production, real estate, or quantitative methods—will find themselves working at firms doing business with other organizations. Many companies have awakened to the fact that they must be market-driven if they are to survive. Being marketdriven means that customer satisfaction and operational efficiency are the order of the day for every department and individual employee or associate. Market-driven means that at many organizations, individuals with complementary expertise and skills work in teams to constantly strive to serve organizational customers better, to innovate, and to develop the means to approach new institutional markets.

Magnitude of Business Marketing
One reason that more marketing majors begin their careers in business marketing than in consumer marketing is because of the magnitude of business marketing. Purchases by organizations such as companies, government agencies, and institutions account for more than half of the economic activity in industrialized countries such as the United States, Canada, and France, making business marketing an important activity. As mentioned earlier, few consumers have the purchasing power of an organization. Understanding how organizations buy is important to marketers who want to capitalize on the size of the business market.

Business Marketing Is Unique
There would be no point in having a separate business marketing class if business marketing were the same as marketing to consumers. If one type of marketing fits all situations, then only one set of classes would be required. The way organizations buy is radically different from the way consumers purchase products and services, which results in different marketing requirements. Let’s examine some ways in which business marketing is unique.